You would be mad to buy a house now. In recent days the Irish housing lobby – which has hijacked the economic debate in this country and made an absolute fortune in the process – has started to spin the line that ‘‘now is a good time to buy’’.
First-time buyers, the most hard-pressed financial subgroup in the country, are being urged by banks and estate agents to take the plunge. Do not be tempted, because you will only be the lemming-like suckers who bail out developers in trouble. Hold onto your cash. Guard it zealously, because prices are headed lower – not just here, but all around the world.
So while the Irish market rallied in midweek and surged again on Friday, the rest of the world is caught like a rabbit in financial headlights. Just consider the fact that Citibank borrowed last week from the investment trust of Abu Dhabi.
The giant US bank borrowed by issuing a bond that is going to pay an 11 per cent coupon (the interest rate).This is worse than a sub-prime interest rate. The problem for Citibank is that no one will lend it money. The moral of the story is that if you play with sub-prime, you eventually become sub-prime yourself.
I am writing this from the City of London, where the mood is sombre. Traders have moved from being worried about their bonuses last month to being worried about their jobs. The crucial thing to understand is that trust between the world’s large banks has evaporated.
No one wants to lend money to the bank that is about to announce another massive write-down from losses in the derivative markets. Because the banks have obfuscated, lied and been economical with the truth about their balance sheets, everyone is suspicious. There is no transparency in the market. Opacity rules the day, and there is a real sense that no one really knows where things are going next.
Therefore the attitude is one of ‘‘guilty until proven innocent’’. In conditions like this, the market dries up. With no one lending or borrowing, the world’s big banks have to depend on the central banks to keep lending cash.
Thus we have seen the Federal Reserve and the ECB pumping money into the system on a daily basis. Yet inter-bank interest rates – the rate at which banks lend to each other – continue to rise. So liquidity, the essential lubricant of the global financial system, has disappeared.
Now, this won’t last forever. The crisis will pass. However, it is likely to have serious ramifications for the world economy, because the crisis in the banking system has come at a time when the American economy is now headed for recession.
The banking system is the heart of every economy. It pumps credit into every nook and cranny of every sector. If it seizes up, the economy suffers the financial equivalent of a heart attack. And, as with humans, if the body is already weakened, the severity of the attack and the subsequent recovery will be affected.
In the US, house prices are falling faster now than at any time since the early 1990s, and the dollar is in free-fall. Meanwhile, there is a real risk of the credit crisis extending into the credit card, motor loan and commercial property sectors.
On a global level, the problem is that the only way the US economy will recover is if the Federal Reserve keeps printing money. This is what it has been doing. But there is a limit to this, because the people who lend money to America in dollars will only tolerate so much. They have effectively been defrauded, as their dollar investments have devalued so much.
Already, China has announced that it is not prepared to hold America assets indefinitely. Europeans must obviously be thinking the same way. The only way the US can redress this is by raising interest rates, and pitching the economy into recession. So it is caught between a rock and a hard place.
This dilemma has been faced by great powers in the past, most noticeably Britain, which had to allow sterling to go into free-fall after the world became aware that British power was waning.
It is far too early to begin writing the obituary on America pre-eminence. However, many people in the City of London are beginning to see the importance of big ideas and geopolitics in understanding the global picture. For the past two decades, the idea that geopolitics mattered has become less and less fashionable, as the financial markets became hostage to the ‘‘quant’’ virus.
Quantitative models, or ‘‘quants’’, have dominated the financial models of large investment banks. I noticed this first in the late 1990s, when the bank I worked for began hiring mainly Indian, Chinese and French mathematicians to build financial models based on tiny anomalies in markets. The banks then borrowed hugely, and made vast fortunes on these irregularities.
The era of the quant was also the era when understanding geopolitics came to be regarded as obsolete. It didn’t seem to matter what countries wanted, and why different countries had different interests. But now it is very much back in demand, as the financial markets realise that the political ramifications stemming from a credit crisis are very real.
If China decided not to buy American assets, what would happen? Why should Europe tolerate a rising euro against the dollar, when the European economy is hardly roaring? Why should world food prices be rising at four times the rate of inflation, and what will happen to world inflation when the pressure from rising food prices kicks in?
Pessimists believe we are entering a new era where the excesses of the past 20 years – the global policy of printing money with nothing to back it up – will come home to roost with cataclysmic results. They see house prices all over the world falling, commodity prices rising, and general chaos emerging. Many well-respected voices are predicting a definite recession in the US and, as they predict that all markets and countries will suffer contagion, some are comparing today’s market meltdown with the 1930s.
Optimists are saying that if the Federal Reserve can cut interest rates dramatically, the US consumer will start to spend other people’s money again and kick-start the economy.
The recession will be short-lived and the recovery will start with the dollar at a lower level, China that bit closer to becoming the biggest economy in the world and oil prices over $100 becoming the norm. Houses prices will fall significantly but plateau, and start moving up again.
It’s impossible to suggest which view is more accurate, but one thing is certain – these big global forces will have far more of an impact on the direction of our economy than anything announced in the Dail next week.
David said: “Why should world food prices be rising at four times the rate of inflation, and what will happen to world inflation when the pressure from rising food prices kicks in?” In effect the trashing of the dollar will force the euro to play the same game.This will generate a new wave of inflation worldwide.This game is 10 centuries old David.Those with cash will wither and lose. Those with property assets will weather the storm and prosper in the end.The transfer of food resources to the production of fuel additives is much more worrying. It will cause much hardship… Read more »
sub
John, I do not agree with your statement that those with cash will wither and lose, I have the cash to buy another property but am waiting for property prices to drop significantly before I do that. Those whom have borrowed lots of cash for their negative equity homes in the past year or more will wither and lose.
John, you’re forgetting that the ECB don’t have the same option of trashing the currency that the Yanks do. The only remit of Trichet and the rest of the boys is to maintain price stability. We may see inflation becoming a bigger problem in the economy but it’s more likely to be caused by external forces such as the Chinese being unable to keep their currency artificially low any longer. Also, and most importantly, this is very unlikely to equate to the wage inflation that is required to maintain asset prices and break the “cash is king maxim. There’s only… Read more »
Any form of property, commercial or residential will be severely affected by the downturn in property prices for many years to come. Unfortunately many homeowners who bought over the past year or so will also be exposed to great difficulties. People who took out a recent mortgage of 90% to 100% may be looking at very large losses if they sell and fairly hefty paper losses if they do not. Often the deposit for a home will represent an entire family’s/individuals savings. Already, many these groups have lost their entire savings, though they will probably not realise this. Many experts… Read more »
My recommended strategy during this downturn is that, if you own a home with substantial equity, sell if possible and then rent. However, if you do not want or cannot become a renter, and are or unwilling to part with your existing home there are a number of different alternatives. These may not be so satisfactory, but they will offer some protection and are better than taking no action at all. The first one would be to investigate refinancing your property and investing the proceeds. The object of this will be to achieve an after tax return on the additional… Read more »
Wise words Paddy, David
Asia-Pacific teenagers top OECD testsBy David Turner, Education CorrespondentDecember 4, 2007 10:07:00 AMÂ Taiwan has topped a prestigious international league table of 15-year-olds’ mathematical ability, vaulting ahead of far richer countries. The island state’s performance in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Pisa tests of mathematics and reading carried out in 2006 and released on Tuesday, reinforces its reputation as a high-tech Asian tiger. Taiwan also earns fourth place in the parallel Pisa science rankings, published last week, although in reading it is a mere 16th. Asia-Pacific’s strong showing is one of the clearest themes of the Pisa survey,… Read more »
How to invest to weather the financial storm?
My advice is to write a book on that…
My feeling is that if you take a good long look at the situation – do the exact opposite of what would have been a good investment over the last 10 years (except commodities maybe, and esp. gold) you can’t do much worse than doing nothing.
Also sell to rent if you can (rumours are that houses no longer sell)
Hi Donall,
Actually doing nothing is a good investment strategy as it preserves your investment. You can do a lot worse by buying a particular investment at the wrong time and you end up with an asset that is losing value!
I would just suggest that you pick a good savings account that has a good rate of interest and a bank that won’t go under.
Ooooppppps I’m sorry, I think there all going to go under. :-)
Getting Irish people to follow a prudet investment strategy is much easier said than done. We simply have an obsession with owning a plot of land with a house thrown on top of it. Clear stupidity in some people’s eyes, but it is arguably a matter of history. Securing one’s plot of land has been a mainstay of national and individual pride sice the days of the Land League back in the 1870s. The issue of homeownership has come up recently in my own family. I myself am happy to rent for the time being; ivesting my deposit and any… Read more »
Irish people are not idiots. The reason for the issues with property is based on the reality that renting is a mugs game. WHY, due to the lack of any reasonable legal protection and an foolish belief on the part of the landlord that rents should be a fixed % of the notional value of the property.
I don’t think you need worry David, most people who could already afford to buy already have, and most of those who don’t are either a) priced out of the “morket” entirely or b) unable to put up sufficient deposit to get a mortgage now that 100% is out the window.
But you are 100% correct in saying that the property industry have hijacked the economic debate. Of course they have, and the scary thing is what their paymasters will extract from the politicians they’ve been “digging out” in the past as recompense for past bribes….sorry…..”loans.”
Rent control. Is the idea so unfeasible?
Being a neutral observer, I am seeing a huge range of views on the subject of where property prices may be heading and how fast they may get there. These range from optimistic (vested interest) to pessimistic (David MW?) with a fair smattering of in-betweens. We are talking about property values here – real assets for which real cash changes hands. Accurate data (rather than “qualified views”) should not be too dificult obtain if the owners of this information (banks / agents / Daft) were forced to make it publicly available. I personally would be very reluctant to invest in… Read more »
Lonely expat:
Im also seeing “reduced to sell” on the FOR SALE signs !! I’ve never seen that chestnut before !!
Nobody considering the prospect of deflation? Something has to contract when all the credit facilities are withdrawn – a bit of scrotum tightening in the snot green sea of debt.
Remember also a lot of people who have bought into so called “affordable housing” in recent times may feel hard done by as prices are falling towards this “discount” level. these buyers are trapped with a council clawback if the property is re-sold in the next ten years.!
Let’s not mix up the whole economy with the individual. *Someone* has to own every property, be it a person, a bank, an insurance company, an investment fund, or whoever. So when prices fall, *someone* takes a hit. As far as the economy is concerned, I’m not sure it matters who it is that takes the hit. No amount of cunning sale-and-leasebacks will save the economy at large, from an overvalued property market. The imbalances caused by the property bubble need to be worked out of the system, so even if property prices held up (e.g. no one had to… Read more »