It’s customary to open the first speech of a conference with the catch-all welcome of “Good morning, ladies and gentlemen”. It’s more of a habit than anything else. It is therefore unusual to then look down more carefully from the podium at the huge hall and realise that there are no ladies present at all.
This absence was one of my first impressions of Saudi Arabia and, although it should have been expected, addressing an all-male audience – many in dresses – in this day and age, feels extremely backward. If a country is trying to be a leading global power and economic giant, excluding half its population seems a bit daft.
That’s Saudi Arabia and I was in its main city, Riyadh.
In contrast, last year at a similar event in Morocco, it couldn’t have been more different. In Morocco, the hall is full of women, they are vocal and questioning, and in Casablanca there is a sense of equality – or at least something moving towards equality. In Saudi, the opposite is the case. Let’s just say that you’d be waiting a while in Riyadh for a #wakingthefeminists Twitter handle!
The difference between both countries and between Saudi Arabia and many other Sunni Muslim countries is that Saudi Arabia has embraced Wahhabism. When I was in Riyadh, I spoke to a few Arab friends to try to get a handle on Wahhabism because, if you want to understand the region, it’s critical to understand this strain of Islam that is preferred by – and exported by – Saudi Arabia.
You can’t understand Isil and what drives them to blow up ancient Roman, Persian and Buddhist monuments without understanding Wahhabis. Nor can you understand what perverted logic drives them to kill innocents without learning about this type of strict Islam.
Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab was born not far from Riyadh in 1703. He trained as a holy man and was, like many religious people, constantly torn between a purist adherence to the original scriptures and a more tolerant accommodation of the word of God leavened with the reality of day-to-day living. This schism is not unusual. The fight between puritanism and pragmatism is after all, at the heart of the great split in the western Christian Church too – what we call the Reformation.
Al Wahhab called for the purification of Islam and a return to pristine Islam. When the young Imam called for the beheading of women in his local town for adultery, the people knew this guy meant business. However, it is likely that this form of extremism wouldn’t have caught on in what was, by the standards of the time, a reasonably tolerant place had it not been for local insurrection against the unpopular Ottoman Empire which ran the Arabian Peninsula and taxed the locals mercilessly.
Possibly in an effort to get God on his side in his fight against Istanbul, the local leader of a small oasis, Mohammad ibn Saud, threw his lot in with the renegade preacher, Al Wahhab, in 1745. The link between the House of Saud and Wahhabi was forged there and then; and they have been allies ever since.
At the time, Islam, like lots of religions, was a concoction of bits of other religions, beliefs and practices. These had been borrowed and customised along the way. Remember this part of the world was the crucible of civilisation, the epicentre of the world’s great trading routes and a place where the three main monotheist religions, Christianity, Judaism and Islam had been founded – Judaism and Christianity literally a few yards from each other, Islam a few hundred miles down the road.
Given this mix, it’s hardly surprising that there were huge overlaps in these faiths and, as Islam was the newest creed, it borrowed the most. Al Wahhab objected to this evolutionary, almost ‘hand-me-down’ approach to Islam. As a purist, he wanted to go back to basics, to make pristine the religion. Possibly the most important tenet of Wahhabis is that they believe in what they call “the oneness of God”. As a result, association with lesser gods, other gods, mysticism, shrines, temples, saints or holy men amounts to idolatry and must be stamped out.
This put Wahhabis on a collision course with the other strains of Islam such as Shi’as or, even worse in the eyes of the Wahhabis, Sufism. Shi’as and Sufis were the enemy within and, of course, Judaism and Christianity were the enemies at the door. Wahhabis called for jihad against all these infidels.
The Saudi/Wahhabi alliance was cemented by war and conquest as Arabian armies, immersed in a pure sectarian Islam, rampaged around the southern flanks of the crumbling Ottoman Empire. The Wahhabis were feared, deploying extremely brutal tactics against their Shi’ite enemies, for example in their sacking in the early 19th century of Karbala, Mecca and Medina, which were particularly vicious. But just in case we Christians get on our high horse, such sectarian savagery was a re-run of the earlier, 17th century, Thirty Years War in Europe.
For a century, the march, and reach, of the Wahhabis was limited to the Arabian Peninsula. Then the game changed, Saudi Arabia struck oil and the politics of the region altered forever, so too did geo-politics and Western economic expedience. Once the Saudis discovered oil, the West snuggled up to Riyadh, no questions asked.
Now the most extreme form of Islam was wedded to the richest country on earth and the Saudis have set about exporting not just oil, but a radical, intolerant form of Islam which drives Isil and various other jihadi groups. Saudi Arabia has spent some of its vast oil wealth on financing madrassas from Malaysia to Manchester – some of which are projecting Wahhabi ideas far from the Gulf.
Isil, with its murder of innocents, its desecration of ancient monuments and its subjugation of women, is the latest incarnation of extreme Wahhabism, and Saudi Arabia – the West’s biggest ally in the region – is Isil’s biggest external financier.
It costs money to wage war and Isil gets money from oil, local racketeering, hostage-taking and external private donations. The private donations come from donors, many of whom are Saudi.
When you follow the money, all radical roads lead back to Saudi Arabia, not states that are supposedly the West’s enemies such as Libya, Iraq or even Assad’s Syria.
From the majority of the 9/11 hijackers, to Bin Laden, his al-Qa’ida chief lieutenants and now Isil, each of these extremist organisations are the 21st century offspring of Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab, the cleric who came out of the desert in the 1730s and the institution he allied with in 1745: the House of Saud.
Subscribe, up early this morning lads – 5am here.
A proverbial butterfly in South America flapping his wings the other day caused the recent barney storm in Ireland .
I wonder did the camel of Wahab have a thousand flees ?
Adam Curtis’ documentary “Bitter Lake” covers this well.
Just a Note from a time Before on this wonderful site Last month I completed a hard back velum bound book of ten copies only revealing the new substrate language spoken in Ireland up to 50,000 years ago directly from West Africa . The book addresses many things about what we we speak in our country and more importantly the mindset from Africa has not changed in all that time . Gaelic eclipsed the Bible , Torah and the Koran and tower of Babel . Copies have been given away to libraries on two continents . You may seek to… Read more »
Hi,
Follow the money and all roads will lead back to failed Neo Keynesian Policies through the middle east and everywhere else.
Don’t believe me?
Marc Faber says so from 6:30;
https://youtu.be/XS7vFVdlvp8
Timely article and great read we must dust off on our history on this.
Also, important to to bear in mind yes but the individual s responsibility to exercise their common sense and see that killing another human being on purpose is anti religious no matter what way one try’s to dress it up comes into play the most.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive”
This article relates to only one aspect (but an important one)of the Rise of ISIS etc.
A truer picture of meddling and proxy support can be seen here.
http://www.salon.com/2015/11/17/we_created_islamic_extremism_those_blaming_islam_for_isis_would_have_supported_osama_bin_laden_in_the_80s/
It will be interesting to see what stand the soccer worldcup nations will take on the Qatar WC. Now that we know these games are riddled with corruption and that there are more and more noises what Qatar involvement is in funding ISIS. It is early days yet but it will come soon to a very hot point of no return. What will individual football associations do, what about the players and what about the national politics that will come into play? Will it go ahead because of the money or will they stay away. It may be the first… Read more »
The official emblem of Saudi Arabia – two swords crossed – symbolizes the Saudi royals and the Wahhabi clergy united.
Saudi Arabia is is using the same defensive tactic as the Byzantines, who would bribe threatening barbarian tribes to attack in the weak west rather than attack Byzantine territory. Now the Saudis send out Wahhabi missionaries, open madrases and convert locals into Wahhabi sects like ISIL, the Taliban, Al Queda, and Boko Haram. Then the Saudis give money to the new redical expressions of Wahhabism to attack the West and Russia.
Saudi Arabia is the enemy of civilization.
If I were a conspiracy theorists – I’m not – I would have to conclude that the determination by the US to destabilize the Mideast through overwhelming military destruction has been a right wing strategy to destroy European social democracy by overwhelming Europe with millions of desperate refugees. But instead I know, as Bernie sanders has put it, that Cheney and Bush were “tough minded but stupid” about the Mideast and that Obama can go only so far in backing off from the Cheney-Bush catastrophe. One of the real reasons for the US Iraq invasion, as discussed in the White… Read more »
First of all, a good article – the Irish media too rarely foray into events and places outside the British isles, let alone give a background to those determining factors, even though they surely have a bigger effect on our lives than, say, 8 cows electrocuted on a field near Calluragh South near Lahinch – one of the main news on 12 November. David’s article seems to fill that gap with historical background. I would like to add mine twopenn’orth: PRELUDE As CitizenWhy pointed out, let’s not forget that the special US-Saudi relations go back to FDR and his deal… Read more »
More truth in that article that in a years coverage of the Middle East from Pravda-RTE, the propaganda organ of the incompetent Irish institutional state. The real power of the Wahhabi advocates, is the fact that their benefactor regime has had massive infleunce on international currency markets until now. The US could have apprehended this power, by being internally efficient, and following the recommendations of James Howard Kunstler. Instead the US went for an unsustainable living arrangement called suburbia, and mall culture. And indeed Ireland has done the same. Saudi Arabia is a powderkeg. And the powder is Wahhabi doctrine.… Read more »
I would not compare the Shia-Sunni split to the Thirty Years War. The Thirty years war started off as the Habsburgs trying to consolidate central Europe, and ended up being about a competing French cardinal screwing up Europe with the idea of the nation state and centralized bureacracy. Just look at the Richelieu model of directional centralized state power as it exists in Ireland today. Highly effective at sucking money out of people – completely ineffective at providing any proper competence in return. It is all a power trip. It is the complete antithesis of what the Irish state should… Read more »
Instead of Western commentators/politicians twisting themselves in a knot with ‘blue sky’ analysis of the ‘geo-political’ yackety-yack bla-bla-bla they should simply sit down, take a couple of days off and read the Koran, the Hadith and the Sira. The Paris outrage and the multitude of violent outrages that will soon become a regular feature in Europe is all there in the original source material. Alas, reading the original ‘holy’ texts, the source behind all these outrages would put Western politicians etc in an awkward position. They would be compelled by decent civilised common-sense to denounce the Koran. Instead, they are… Read more »
An interesting argument, involving Hitchens again.
Actually, Dennis Praeger makes very intelligent arguments, concerning the intellectual dishonesty that exists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQhwMdjoUPU
Stopping ISIS: Follow the Money
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43461.htm
http://moneymorning.com/2015/11/19/what-isis-blood-oil-really-means-for-oil-markets/
The cleric mentioned in this article Abd al Wahhab impacted his version of the language of Islam and this has become relevant in the World today .His words and interpretations form a ‘mindset’ that entraps the followers to do just that and not allowed to ask any questions . We in Ireland since the formation of the State have also ‘a cleric’ in the guise as ‘bureaucracy’ and the mindsets impacted by the State are ‘ official words’ in the First Language namely Irish in accordance with its own ‘Koran’ known as ‘ De Bhaldraithe ‘ . Original words in… Read more »
http://www.newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795
Good article David. It is curious how the West is allied with the most backward Islamic nations and demonises and bombs and invades the most advanced and secular (not claiming they are as advanced as we are; of course not). Remember those absurd ‘Friends of Syria’ charades put on by Hillary Clinton, where all the rhetoric was of freedom and democracy, and sitting next to Hillary was a Saudi prince; in a dress. I don’t know how anyone can take the foreign policies of the Washington regime seriously or on face value. The news from Saudi Arabia today is that… Read more »
The poet in Saudi Arabia condemned to death claims he is a practicing Muslim and that he is being put to death because he offended the religious police with a video on YouTube. He has not been allowed to get a lawyer.
Does anyone outside the US really believe that US military actions are about installing democracy and freedom? If so, why would the US not invade Saudi Arabia?
” If a country is trying to be a leading global power and economic giant, excluding half its population seems a bit daft.” Saudi Arabia is a giant oil well with little other business activity. It is run by a a cabal of medieval autocratic princelings who is prop up the rest of the economy with huge subsidies. They have a deal with the US to sell oil based on US dollars in return for being protected by the the, from the, US war machine. The US in return is being run by the central banker cabal that controls the… Read more »
“Ending Blowback Terrorism”
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/islamic-state-blowback-terrorism-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2015-11#4QWqfK0lgbrREaJY.99
“The main obstacle I see against the replacement of oil is ‘Big Oil’ and the strangle hold it has on the economy. Maybe this can be loosened with future innovation that allows ‘small business’ to generate its own energy.” Alot of people mistakenly think that oil can be easily replaced and we just need to get “big oil” out of the way and throw a few billion into R+D and then we will have clean cheap energy. If only it were that simple its not a “little red riding hood and the big bad wolf fairytale”. It makes you wonder… Read more »
where do i start..? A Solution ?…..nah..to have a solution , you firstly have to acknowledge you have a..[or are] the problem…..and that has not happened. if America is the patient..how big should the couch be ?..Or now that the rest of the West has lost its way should they be invited ?..therefore , is the couch to small ?. …perhaps 28 chairs in circles ?. It could be a support group. But wait..!!! to seek help..you must first ask for help. It seems America still wants to blame everyone else , therefore not taking responsibility for her Actions…she is… Read more »
Peter Hitchens is full of shit……
but i appreciate the comment.
Robert Fisk: We still haven’t grasped that this is war without frontiers
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/robert-fisk-we-still-havent-grasped-that-this-is-war-without-frontiers-34221473.html
Excellent Article Adam. I have to say i am a big fan of Robert Fisk.
I agree with his writings & opinion.
Hope all well with you on “island in de sun” ?
Barry
Money is soon to be no cash. Be assured ISIS uses Bitcoin to transfer millions (my supposition). Negative interest rates will be assured by the bankers as savers and pensions are destroyed.
http://www.theburningplatform.com/2015/11/19/the-fed-induced-farce/
http://ellenbrown.com/
Don’t forget to hate refugees as you set up a nativity scene.
Celebrating a Middle Eastern couple desperately looking for shelter.
https://www.facebook.com/boingboing/photos/a.10151118038581179.438569.27479046178/10153240226836179/?type=3
From Max Keiser, on Kilkennomics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASBw-LW5mJg
Constantin is a legend.
The Dublin housing market is bottlenecked. The supply of second hand cars is bottlenecked.
Gurdgiev says one sentence that tells the ultimate truth about the situation. The wrong entities are being taxed.
He could have added that the taxes are sent in the wrong direction, when spent, also. But that would have resulted in all out war from the institutional state.
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
H. L. Mencken
Wikileaks documents detail/prove that Saudi Arabia is funding terrorist organizations. of course the USA has known this for many, many years, pretends it isn’t so, or that piddling “reforms” have eliminated the problem. Russia also knows, is not fooled.
http://deadstate.org/wikileaks-cables-shows-that-saudi-arabia-is-a-virtual-atm-machine-for-islamic-extremists/
[…] Behr's reaction to James Corbyn's reactions to Paris shootings is worth reading. A brief history lesson on the roots of Islamic terror by David McWilliams. Wall Street Journal on the buyback boom in […]
Looks like Trump has gone off the deep end:
“Donald Trump calls to ban all Muslims from entering US”
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/07/donald-trump-ban-all-muslims-entering-us-san-bernardino-shooting
Whether you agree with him or not, it’s just not a viable election strategy.
He may as well hand victory to Clinton.