Introduce a congestion charge and make public transport free

Election season can be an opportunity to signal a change in behaviour. Arguably the politics of behaviour is one of the key crucibles of any modern election. People change their habits and do so regularly.

For example, in the 1970s, people lit up almost anywhere, smoking away in other people’s houses, in pubs and on buses. Today, smokers congregate outside. In the 1980s, drink driving was common. It was regarded as a bit iffy but we did it.

Today, for nearly everybody it is a complete no no. Some older drivers are still at it, but socially, drink driving is completely unacceptable. Had you told my late father – a lifelong dog lover, owner and walker – that he’d be expected to pick up his own dog’s droppings in a bag, he would have laughed you out of the park.

Yet all these behavioural changes have come about and are now accepted to such an extent that people can’t imagine going back to the old ways. This is what societal change looks like. Something that was once accepted as normal becomes an affront to respectable folk.

This brings me to the lunacy of rush-hour traffic, which is an affront to our intelligence, our health and the environment. It is time to apply economics to traffic, particularly traffic in our cities, most notably Dublin. Traffic and congestion should be a major electoral issue.

Public road

Let’s not start with cars, but let’s begin with public property, the public road. Traffic is a space issue: there are too many cars in the limited space of the road at a particular time of the day. Because cars clog up the roads, more efficient and more sociable modes of transport, such as buses and more environmentally-friendly modes of transport such as cycling are crowded out.

Even where there are bus lanes, the needs of cars on the cramped roads interfere with the buses, playing havoc with timetables and undermining the service.

A good way to look at this issue is through the lens of property rights or the lack of them. Congested roads at rush hours are desired by drivers the same way houses with sea views are desired by home owners.

In the housing market, access to houses with sea views are rationed by price, being far more expensive than others. But at the moment, road space at rush hour is not rationed, so we have a free-for-all, a mechanised version of anarchy. Because no one is charged, everyone suffers.

When you get in your car at rush hour, you don’t think about the others who are also suffering. Because you add a fraction of time to everyone else’s commute, the aggregate impact of too many cars is gridlock. This is called the “paradox of aggregation” in economics. What is good for the individual (you driving at rush hour) is bad for the collective (everyone stuck in traffic, polluting the atmosphere).

Dubliners spend on average 246 hours in traffic every year. That’s more than Paris (237) and London (227). Moreover, Dublin is believed to be the slowest city centre, dipping as low as six miles per hour (9.6km/h). Traffic woes in Galway, Cork and other Irish cities are common knowledge.

The impact of rush-hour traffic is clocked by the fact that at peak times, general Dublin speeds reach about 18 km/h; at off-peak times, speeds are about 37km/h, rising during “free-flow” times to an average of 45 km/h.

In economics this phenomenon is called the “iron law of congestion”. It was coined by the American economist Anthony Downs in 1962, and the law states: “On urban commuter expressways, peak-hour traffic congestion rises to meet maximum capacity.”

It is not a matter of too few roads, it is the fact that if we don’t price the property called the road properly, at times that it is desired, we get chaos. Obviously, a congestion charge is one answer to our traffic issues. A little gizmo can pick up the licence plate, and the driver driving at peak hours is charged. The charge should be explained to drivers before they buy a car.

Last year, 120,000 new cars were bought here. The more roads we build, the more cars will be bought to fill them. This is what economists call “induced demand”, meaning the extra demand for cars is induced by the extra road space. Bigger/wider/more roads means more cars and traffic.

Peak time in Ireland begins at about 6.30am and lasts until 10am, and then starts again at 4pm with the suburban school run and lasts until 7.30pm. Significant congestion charges should be applied in these hours in the city and suburbs.

Congestion charges have worked well in Singapore, London and Stockholm. For example, following the introduction of their congestion charge in 2007, Stockholm saw an immediate effect with roughly 100,000 fewer cars entering the congestion zone compared with the previous year.

But we could go one step further.

In this election, a political party that is serious about congestion, the environment and road safety could make all public transport free. Despite regularly hearing that our public transport system doesn’t work, it could be much better but, in fact it works for a lot of us.

Motor tax

Public transport usage is up about 25 per cent since 2013. Making it free is doable and could be easily financed out of the tax we raise now from motor tax.

And as well as an economic argument for free public transport, there’s a moral one: If elements of health and education are free, why not transport – another public good? 

Last year, Minister for Transport Shane Ross, considering the potential costs of introducing a free public transport system said: “If such services were to be provided free to passengers . . . [it] would cost the taxpayer about €600 million per year, in addition to the €400 million that the exchequer already spends on public transport services.”

Motor tax alone raised more than €981 million in 2018. If we ring-fenced motor tax to make all public transport free, such a “targeted” tax initiative would cover the cost, with €381 million left to build cycle lanes.

The ultimate aim of these policies should be to follow Oslo’s recent example and ban all cars from our city centres. This is the future of urban living, not to mention a requirement of cutting carbon emissions.

For years we have designed cities for cars, and that’s what we got: more cars. Now we have to change our behaviour and go the other way. It will take time and lots of detailed investment in more public transport.

However, using basic economics, it makes sense to introduce a congestion charge for the privilege of driving at peak hours and at the same time to reduce to zero the cost to the commuter of public transport, financing the shortfall from motor tax, and ring-fencing what’s left of motor tax to build cycle lanes.

If not now, when?

Introduce a congestion charge and make public transport free

Election season can be an opportunity to signal a change in behaviour. Arguably the politics of behaviour is one of the key crucibles of any modern election. People change their habits and do so regularly.

For example, in the 1970s, people lit up almost anywhere, smoking away in other people’s houses, in pubs and on buses. Today, smokers congregate outside. In the 1980s, drink driving was common. It was regarded as a bit iffy but we did it.

read more

The party that taxes land hoarding will get my vote

The imminent general election is likely to boil down to a showdown between the party of bricklayers and the party of bookkeepers.

In a country where we need to build housing yet keep within a budget, the bookkeepers will try to convince us that they can build, and the bricklayers will assert that they can balance the books. Which one of these voters believe will likely be the party that wins.

read more

Eight global economic trends affecting Ireland

It’s pretty clear that we will have an election in the next six months. Although most of the debate will focus on domestic issues, particularly what can be termed supply issues, such as housing and transport, it is a good exercise, at the start of the year, to stand back and take stock of what is likely to be happening outside this jurisdiction.

Here are eight economic and political issues affecting Ireland.

read more

Where is the slowdown experts warned us about?

When examining what is going on in any economy it is essential to have a framework to understand how the economy works and where it sits in the global scheme.

One of the reasons I was so agitated by the credit/housing boom of the 2000-2008 period is that in any framework the economy was bound for meltdown. You could go so far as to say that that economy was set up to fail. Yet all the official economic forecasting institutes missed it, preaching the soft landing mantra.

Today, those same institutes have been underestimating the strength of the economy year in year out since 2015. Indeed, official economic organisations have been at one in warning that there would be a Brexit-inspired slump by now, arguing that uncertainty would ebb away at confidence, leading to a slowdown. But the opposite has happened.

read more

Without multinationals, Ireland is a bad-weather Albania

It’s easy to be a little perplexed by attitudes towards multinationals, given their transformative impact on our economy, their complete upgrading of our industrial base and the enormous capital and technological transfer their presence in Ireland has facilitated.

Economically, without multinational investment, Ireland would be Albania with brutal weather. Politically, without multinational commitment to Ireland, Ireland would likely have succumbed to the populist, nationalist, protectionist disease that is afflicting most western politics.

Ireland’s economic performance can be divided into two time zones; premultinationals and postmultinationals. In the premultinational period, from 1921 to 1991, when multinational investment was modest here, the Irish economy was the worst performer, in terms of income per head, in western Europe. Not the fifth-worst, not the third-worst; the worst. Since the multinationals began to select Ireland as a bridgehead into the EU, from the early 1990s onwards, Ireland has been the best performer economically in western Europe. Not the fifth best; the best.

read more

A Swift lesson in Irish economics

Today is Dean Jonathan Swift’s birthday. He was born on November 30th, 1667, in the parish of St Werburgh’s in Dublin. Last weekend, I was asked to speak at his cathedral, St Patrick’s, as part of the Swift Festival.

It’s not every day you share an altar with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby (or indeed, with a former president of this country, Mary McAleese). The subject was identity and, specifically, Irish and British identity after Brexit.

Given the enormous constitutional upheavals that could be triggered by Brexit, not just in Britain between England and Scotland but obviously on our island too, “conflicted identity” may become a political buzzword of the third decade of the 21st century.

read more

The post-Trump era could see the disruption of capitalism

The word impeachment comes from the Latin “impedicare” meaning to catch with the foot or trip up. The American process of impeachment was inherited from the English. In pre-independence colonial America, the British instituted a process of impeachment to make sure that the king of England’s officials in the colonies, who had enormous powers, remained straight.

Originally, impeachment was a process whereby a grand jury was instructed to find sufficient evidence to commit to trial a high-ranking official – or indeed colonial governor – who might be taking bribes, using his position to advance his personal cause or consorting treasonously with a foreign power. Back then the foreign power would have been France, as imperial France was constantly at war with imperial Britain in north America and the Caribbean.

After the War of Independence, the USA did not start as a republic with a constitution but as a loose confederation of equal sovereign states. This messy arrangement proved far too disparate; and the revolutionaries decided to create a strong centralised executive with a president.

read more

Ireland’s Monopoly money rents are no game

Looking out at the Atlantic from Lahinch in Co Clare, it’s hard to believe that one in 10 people was evicted in Ireland during the Famine. Two million Irish people emigrated in the 15 years from 1840 to 1855. Out here you can still sense this emptiness. Most Irish emigrants left from the west coast, heading across the ocean. Imagine what this part of the country would look like had they stayed.

The Famine, the result of immediate crop failure, was also the direct consequence of the conflict between a land-owning class and a landless class, leading to the Land League, which, most Irish historians agree, was the catalyst for the independence movement that led to the creation of the State.

Seen against this background, it can be hard to understand why the interests of the land and its income – rent – are still regarded as sacrosanct in Ireland.

read more

Article Archives

David has been writing for almost 20 years and there are plenty of articles covering some of the most turbulent times in the world economy.

Head over to the archives page to view all published articles.