<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new brand of populism surfaces in Germany</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany</link>
	<description>The website of economist, author and broadcaster, David McWilliams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Yes David, Der Speigal in English -
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes David, Der Speigal in English -<br />
<a href="http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international" rel="nofollow">http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david mc williams</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>david mc williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-448</guid>
		<description>thanks for the above comments on Germany, its elections 
and different parties, is there a good source for up to 
date German news/commentary in English that any of you 
would recommend? thanks again, david  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the above comments on Germany, its elections<br />
and different parties, is there a good source for up to<br />
date German news/commentary in English that any of you<br />
would recommend? thanks again, david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

You mention that Die Linke are a new political party that 
have come out of nowhere in Germany. This is inaccurate. 
They are the old Communist party from the former GDR that 
formed after a shady amalgamation of the Russian zone&#039;s 
SPD and the KPD in 1946 to form the German Socialist Unity 
party (SED), which was the party of the ruling regime 
until reunification in 1989. After reunification they 
renamed themselves SED-PDS, and in 1990 PDS (Party of 
German Socialists), basically a kind of Democratic Left 
or &quot;reformed&quot; communists to differentiate from the 
traditional German socialist party SPD, who are basically 
Social-Democrat. The Likspartei formed this year when they 
amalgamated with the WASG (Literally &quot;The voter&#039;s 
alternative for work and equality) who are disgruntled ex 
SPD members that are a kind of &quot;Old Labour&quot;. WASG formed 
in the western &quot;old Germany&quot; in 2004.

PDS has always had around 20 per cent of the vote in 
Eastern &quot;new&quot; Germany, but never gained much ground in the 
old states of the Federal Republic. However, this 
amalgamation may be seen as a tactical move to gain more 
ground in the old Laender from traditional left wing 
voters disillusioned by the SPD&#039;s &quot;blairist&quot; policies. 
However, I expect they may steal more ground from the 
Greens than from the SPD, as many disillusioned SPD voters 
that are more centrist may shift to the Christian 
Democrats (CDU/CSU) or the Liberals (FDP). I suspect the 
next German Government will be more of a rainbow coalition 
with the usual policies rather than any new populistic 
majority. At least in the Federal Elections. However, they 
may do well in State, Municipal and European elections. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>You mention that Die Linke are a new political party that<br />
have come out of nowhere in Germany. This is inaccurate.<br />
They are the old Communist party from the former GDR that<br />
formed after a shady amalgamation of the Russian zone&#8217;s<br />
SPD and the KPD in 1946 to form the German Socialist Unity<br />
party (SED), which was the party of the ruling regime<br />
until reunification in 1989. After reunification they<br />
renamed themselves SED-PDS, and in 1990 PDS (Party of<br />
German Socialists), basically a kind of Democratic Left<br />
or &#8220;reformed&#8221; communists to differentiate from the<br />
traditional German socialist party SPD, who are basically<br />
Social-Democrat. The Likspartei formed this year when they<br />
amalgamated with the WASG (Literally &#8220;The voter&#8217;s<br />
alternative for work and equality) who are disgruntled ex<br />
SPD members that are a kind of &#8220;Old Labour&#8221;. WASG formed<br />
in the western &#8220;old Germany&#8221; in 2004.</p>
<p>PDS has always had around 20 per cent of the vote in<br />
Eastern &#8220;new&#8221; Germany, but never gained much ground in the<br />
old states of the Federal Republic. However, this<br />
amalgamation may be seen as a tactical move to gain more<br />
ground in the old Laender from traditional left wing<br />
voters disillusioned by the SPD&#8217;s &#8220;blairist&#8221; policies.<br />
However, I expect they may steal more ground from the<br />
Greens than from the SPD, as many disillusioned SPD voters<br />
that are more centrist may shift to the Christian<br />
Democrats (CDU/CSU) or the Liberals (FDP). I suspect the<br />
next German Government will be more of a rainbow coalition<br />
with the usual policies rather than any new populistic<br />
majority. At least in the Federal Elections. However, they<br />
may do well in State, Municipal and European elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-442</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very thought provoking article. The fact that you<br />
started your article with a reference to Dublin in 1905 is<br />
interesting and mirrors another article I was reading.<br />
Niall Ferguson a Cambridge historian has written an<br />
article “Sinking Globalisation” about how the current<br />
period we are now in bears striking resemblances to the<br />
period leading up to the first World War. That period was<br />
also a period of globalisation, immigration and increasing<br />
international trade. It was a period of great optimism<br />
where no great wars had been fought for a long time. He is<br />
warning that globalisation is very fragile and may easily<br />
be reversed if powerful countries feel that they are<br />
losing out economically. The First World War ended the<br />
first period of globalisation and he is warning that the<br />
same thing could happen again.<br />
	However I disagree with your analysis that Germany<br />
has the most to lose from  globalisation and Chinese<br />
manufacturing. I think that Germany has been remarkably<br />
successful in maintaining its strong industrial base in<br />
this new era of globalisation. Germany doesn’t really<br />
compete with Chinese manufactured goods because Germany<br />
mainly exports industrial equipment and machinery. I think<br />
that Germany in fact entered this new era in 1990 with the<br />
fall of communism and it had to cope with reintegrating<br />
the much poorer East Germany which has now been<br />
accomplished. The Linkspar is merely an echo from the the<br />
old East Germany.  However there are other countries most<br />
notably the anglo saxon countries which have “yet” to deal<br />
with this new era and whose economies have not “yet”<br />
noticed the effect that China and the former soviet<br />
countries will have on the global economy. These countries<br />
havn’t noticed the new era “yet” because as you have<br />
pointed out  they have had their own little side show<br />
going on which has insulated them from Chinese competition.<br />
“The reason this same process has not led to a rise in<br />
American unemployment is that the US has replaced<br />
manufacturing jobs with service jobs, and its service<br />
economy is driven by its credit bubble, which has been<br />
fuelled, as in Ireland, by its housing boom.”<br />
However when this ends then the real trouble will start,<br />
the US/British/Irish worker will then realise the full<br />
effect of China and how much ground has been lost. So I<br />
don’t see much trouble coming from Germany but more likely<br />
closer to home. As an aside if you wander down Grafton<br />
street or Temple bar,  Dublin in 2005 also feels like a<br />
very British city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Dublin wasn&#039;t exactly built by the Gael ;)

Neo-nazis have been active in Germnay in the past 15 years
at least. Auslander Aus was a favourite slogan chant.

America is expanding its free trade agreements with Central
America, I don&#039;t think that the decisions that the US
government makes are based upon the idea of providing jobs
for the American people. Most of the decisions that that
government has made were more benefitial to the
corporations, and thus the shareholders. The wonders of the
MBA mentality ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dublin wasn&#8217;t exactly built by the Gael ;)</p>
<p>Neo-nazis have been active in Germnay in the past 15 years<br />
at least. Auslander Aus was a favourite slogan chant.</p>
<p>America is expanding its free trade agreements with Central<br />
America, I don&#8217;t think that the decisions that the US<br />
government makes are based upon the idea of providing jobs<br />
for the American people. Most of the decisions that that<br />
government has made were more benefitial to the<br />
corporations, and thus the shareholders. The wonders of the<br />
MBA mentality ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2005/08/15/a-new-brand-of-populism-surfaces-in-germany/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1183921895#comment-444</guid>
		<description>I think you are being a bit unfair to die Linke (official 
name for die Linkspartei.PDS). I agree that their policies 
don&#039;t make much sense, but I wouldn&#039;t call the anti 
American.

I think most Germans, including potential voters of die 
Linke, are aware that the real threat to their jobs comes 
from cheaper labour to the east, be that eastern Europe or 
Asia. The fear to the west isn&#039;t really anti Americanism 
but rather what you might call anti &quot;anglo-saxon 
capitalism&quot;. There has been a lot of publicity here about 
US or UK hedge funds buying out companies, firing a large 
percentage of the workforce to improve the balance sheet 
and then selling the company within a very short time frame 
for a handsome profit. 

For west Germans, this goes against the German version of 
capitalism, which promoted corporate social responsibility. 
German capitalism also was often managed a bit like a 
cartel, and as long as the jobs were secure, this didn&#039;t 
bother anyone too much. For East Germans, well this whole 
capitalism thing is pretty new, and the experiences up 
until now havn&#039;t been particularly good. Since 1991, huge 
numbers of traditional manufacturing jobs in the East have 
disappeared since the factories were suddenly forced to pay 
West German wages, but the productivity was still on a par 
with Poland. In many east German towns, there are 
demolition programs to knock down appartment blocks that no 
one wants to live in any more. And since the populations of 
these towns are decreasing, no new appartments are being 
built in their place.

As an aside, I think the main reasons for the lack of a 
housing boom are the banks and the rental laws. 
Traditionally banks have demanded that the borrower put up 
at least 20% of the price of a property in order to get a 
mortgage. This is prohibitivly expensive for most. Secondly 
the rental laws are such that many tenants feel secure in 
rental properties. Couple this to the fact that the Germans 
are quite risk adverse (I know it&#039;s a generalisation, but 
IMHO it holds true) and you&#039;ve got a predominantly renting 
population. Home ownership here is at about 43%. This is 
changing slowly as the deposit required is decreasing, and 
as US investment firms are buying up whole appartment 
blocks. One of the few legal ways of raising the rent 
beyond inflation is to renovate an appartment block, thus 
raising the value of the appartments. If the old tennant 
can not afford to pay the raised rent and moves out, then 
new tennants can be charged whatever the landlord likes.

Returning to die Linke. They are largely comprised of PDS 
members - the decendants of the East German communist party 
SED. They merged with a group called WASG (voters alliance 
for social justice), who protested against labour and dole 
reforms last summer. Their main figure is Oscar Lafontaine. 
He was Chancellor Schroeder&#039;s right hand man when the 
socialist/green coalition ousted Helmut Kohl and first took 
power in 1998. He mysteriously resigned from the cabinet 
within a couple of months. It was believed that the cabinet 
wasn&#039;t left wing enough for him. He&#039;s spent the last couple 
of years appearing on German political TV shows, 
criticising the government and big business for their lack 
of social justice, and receiving handsome appearance fees 
for his work.

The polls currently give die Linke 9%. They&#039;ve been 
dropping support regularly since their inception. This is 
partially due to the pounding they get from much of the 
media. Almost everyone knows that their policies can&#039;t be 
financed, but many will vote for them anyway as a form of 
protest against all the established parties. Prior to this, 
the ex communists always managed to do reasonably well in 
the east, but nationally they never got above the required 
5% to take their seats in the German parliament. The merger 
with the WASG, and the high profile Lafontaine, has changed 
this.

Now that the Linke will surely pass the 5% threshold and 
take their seats in the parliament, the opposition 
Christian Democrats are getting worried. They were sure 
that they were going to win the election and form the next 
government with the help of the Liberal Party. Die Linke 
are threatening this majority. It is becoming more probable 
that the only possiblity after the election will be 
a &quot;grand coalition&quot; of the center right Christian Democrats 
with Chancelor Schroeder&#039;s center left Socialists. In this 
case, Die Linke may be the largest opposition party in the 
parliament.

There have been a few slightly dubious anti-foreigner 
statements from die Linke. However their policies and 
propaganda are largely 70&#039;s style socialism. The real fear 
is that their populist agenda and position as leader of the 
opposition will increase the feeling of discontent within 
Germany. Utlimatly this will benefit the neo nazi parties, 
as they will surely capitalise on the general mood, and 
spread their version of populist politics. This will be a 
lot more dangerous that the current strain of populism from 
die Linke. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being a bit unfair to die Linke (official<br />
name for die Linkspartei.PDS). I agree that their policies<br />
don&#8217;t make much sense, but I wouldn&#8217;t call the anti<br />
American.</p>
<p>I think most Germans, including potential voters of die<br />
Linke, are aware that the real threat to their jobs comes<br />
from cheaper labour to the east, be that eastern Europe or<br />
Asia. The fear to the west isn&#8217;t really anti Americanism<br />
but rather what you might call anti &#8220;anglo-saxon<br />
capitalism&#8221;. There has been a lot of publicity here about<br />
US or UK hedge funds buying out companies, firing a large<br />
percentage of the workforce to improve the balance sheet<br />
and then selling the company within a very short time frame<br />
for a handsome profit. </p>
<p>For west Germans, this goes against the German version of<br />
capitalism, which promoted corporate social responsibility.<br />
German capitalism also was often managed a bit like a<br />
cartel, and as long as the jobs were secure, this didn&#8217;t<br />
bother anyone too much. For East Germans, well this whole<br />
capitalism thing is pretty new, and the experiences up<br />
until now havn&#8217;t been particularly good. Since 1991, huge<br />
numbers of traditional manufacturing jobs in the East have<br />
disappeared since the factories were suddenly forced to pay<br />
West German wages, but the productivity was still on a par<br />
with Poland. In many east German towns, there are<br />
demolition programs to knock down appartment blocks that no<br />
one wants to live in any more. And since the populations of<br />
these towns are decreasing, no new appartments are being<br />
built in their place.</p>
<p>As an aside, I think the main reasons for the lack of a<br />
housing boom are the banks and the rental laws.<br />
Traditionally banks have demanded that the borrower put up<br />
at least 20% of the price of a property in order to get a<br />
mortgage. This is prohibitivly expensive for most. Secondly<br />
the rental laws are such that many tenants feel secure in<br />
rental properties. Couple this to the fact that the Germans<br />
are quite risk adverse (I know it&#8217;s a generalisation, but<br />
IMHO it holds true) and you&#8217;ve got a predominantly renting<br />
population. Home ownership here is at about 43%. This is<br />
changing slowly as the deposit required is decreasing, and<br />
as US investment firms are buying up whole appartment<br />
blocks. One of the few legal ways of raising the rent<br />
beyond inflation is to renovate an appartment block, thus<br />
raising the value of the appartments. If the old tennant<br />
can not afford to pay the raised rent and moves out, then<br />
new tennants can be charged whatever the landlord likes.</p>
<p>Returning to die Linke. They are largely comprised of PDS<br />
members &#8211; the decendants of the East German communist party<br />
SED. They merged with a group called WASG (voters alliance<br />
for social justice), who protested against labour and dole<br />
reforms last summer. Their main figure is Oscar Lafontaine.<br />
He was Chancellor Schroeder&#8217;s right hand man when the<br />
socialist/green coalition ousted Helmut Kohl and first took<br />
power in 1998. He mysteriously resigned from the cabinet<br />
within a couple of months. It was believed that the cabinet<br />
wasn&#8217;t left wing enough for him. He&#8217;s spent the last couple<br />
of years appearing on German political TV shows,<br />
criticising the government and big business for their lack<br />
of social justice, and receiving handsome appearance fees<br />
for his work.</p>
<p>The polls currently give die Linke 9%. They&#8217;ve been<br />
dropping support regularly since their inception. This is<br />
partially due to the pounding they get from much of the<br />
media. Almost everyone knows that their policies can&#8217;t be<br />
financed, but many will vote for them anyway as a form of<br />
protest against all the established parties. Prior to this,<br />
the ex communists always managed to do reasonably well in<br />
the east, but nationally they never got above the required<br />
5% to take their seats in the German parliament. The merger<br />
with the WASG, and the high profile Lafontaine, has changed<br />
this.</p>
<p>Now that the Linke will surely pass the 5% threshold and<br />
take their seats in the parliament, the opposition<br />
Christian Democrats are getting worried. They were sure<br />
that they were going to win the election and form the next<br />
government with the help of the Liberal Party. Die Linke<br />
are threatening this majority. It is becoming more probable<br />
that the only possiblity after the election will be<br />
a &#8220;grand coalition&#8221; of the center right Christian Democrats<br />
with Chancelor Schroeder&#8217;s center left Socialists. In this<br />
case, Die Linke may be the largest opposition party in the<br />
parliament.</p>
<p>There have been a few slightly dubious anti-foreigner<br />
statements from die Linke. However their policies and<br />
propaganda are largely 70&#8242;s style socialism. The real fear<br />
is that their populist agenda and position as leader of the<br />
opposition will increase the feeling of discontent within<br />
Germany. Utlimatly this will benefit the neo nazi parties,<br />
as they will surely capitalise on the general mood, and<br />
spread their version of populist politics. This will be a<br />
lot more dangerous that the current strain of populism from<br />
die Linke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

