Immigration is a feminist issue. It will become more so in the years ahead. Irish women stand to gain disproportionately more than anyone else from ongoing immigration and should support the reduction of barriers to entering the country.
Immigration is now central to our societal balance.This is because of two of the biggest changes in Ireland in the past decade: the dramatic rise in the number of Irish women going out to work and the equally dramatic rise in the number of poor foreign women coming here to look after our children and clean our homes.
One can’t exist without the other, and it perplexes me that our female politicians in particular, do not protest more at the various bans, blockages and restrictions on the free movement of people that have become commonplace in recent years.Without Ireland’s army of immigrant nannies, childminders, babysitters and cleaners, the liberation of Irish women would be stuck in the “working mother quagmire” – the sticky, problematic and divisive area between being a good worker and a good mother.
Some may take umbrage at the idea that the “liberation” of Irish women to work and further their careers has been built on the “oppression” of other women, but unpalatable truths are a fact of life.The case remains that someone has to do what I’ve heard described as the “shit work” – shop for and prepare the hurried dinner,wipe up Johnny’s puke, clean the loo, change the sheets and remember to buy bin bags.
There are only so many hours in the day, and one certain path to divorce is for Mam to go out to work for 11 hours a day, commute and be expected to make perfect pea risotto with a smile in the evening. Something has to give on a practical level.
On a psychological level, immigrants may also be the essential gelling agent between many Irish women’s expectations and reality. Without poor foreign women to help, something deep in the society would also snap.
Due to rapid advances in education,young girls’ expectations have changed – and rightly so. Girls are told in school that they can have it all: a good career, fulfilling motherhood and a fine standard of living.
When I look back, it was totally different in the suburb where I was brought up in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Less than 10 per cent of the mums went to work.The reality of suburban living was that most women’s expectations stopped at the front door.
Nearly everyone’s mother was at home at lunchtime and could be counted on to be on hand with plasters and TCP when we fell off the wall.Today, leased cars jam the same road every morning with young mothers trying to get out to work.Whether out of economic necessity, ambition, or whatever the reason, the guilt that the average working woman feels about not being the best mother runs deep.
More than 60 per cent of Irish women go out to work every day (which rises to 83 per cent for those in their 20s). It is government and European policy to increase this figure towards 70 per cent. (In fact, the ludicrously titled Lisbon Agenda that our EU presidency trumpets entails explicit targets for female participation as part of our overall economic aims.) At the same time as more young women are working,we are experiencing a mini-baby-boom, the echo of the original Irish baby boom that peaked in 1980.
For many young Irish mothers,the precise intersection of their two most passionate influences – their profound, almost physical love for their children and their fervent wish to make something of themselves beyond the hall door – is the exact spot where the foreign worker turns up for work each day.
This intricate relationship will become stronger over the coming years, for a variety of reasons. First, the number of educated women will increase relative to men. Second, there are two classes of women who make up the new workforce.
The first are the highly successful, professional women who now make up most of the graduates in law firms, accounting firms and in other professional services. In this group are a significant number of Irish women who are setting up their own businesses. Arguably, they have chosen to address the dilemma of working motherhood head on.
However, there is another distinct and much larger group of working mothers for whom long hours are not a choice but a necessity. In the recent past, the social status quo was entirely predicated on one wage being sufficient to keep the house going.This is no longer the case.
Probably the most significant social change affecting fathers in the past ten years has been the erosion in the real purchasing power of Dad’s wage. Mothers have to go out to work to keep the show on the road.Wages have not increased dramatically since the mid-1990s.
Wages have gone up by somewhere in the region of 50 per cent,while utility bills have gone up by nearly half that since 2000 alone, and house prices have risen by 300 per cent since 1996. In addition to – but quite apart from – the eclipse of the one-wage family,the other factor causing women to go out to work in such huge numbers is single parenthood.
OECD studies (Bosses and Babies 2003) have shown that this is the single biggest contributory factor to the impoverishment, both financially and educationally, of young Irish women.
Irish women are still paid less than Irish men. Many are in a poverty trap, and they fill an increasing number of minimum-wage positions. So the dilemma for the feminist movement is how do to get out of this cul-desac. Speaking as a feminist, this means that some extremely unpalatable issues have to be admitted.
The most crucial of these it to realise that the gains made by the liberation of women can only be solidified and enhanced by the labours of oppressed foreign women doing the shit jobs. Ironically, all through the ages, the standard of living of the aspirant class has been sustained by the work of an underclass – largely unseen, largely ignored and lar gely foreign. From ancient Rome to modern America and modern Ireland that is the case.
Let’s look forward a bit.
The government and the IDA keep telling us that we must move up the value chain to protect our prosperity from the likes of India and China.This means, in plain English, that we have to become better educated, smarter and more productive.This in turn implies more of us continuing to work long hours.
The more we move up the so-called value chain, the more Irish women who are now working out of necessity will graduate to working out of choice. However,the dilemma remains: who will look after the kids?
1970s feminist theory suggested that the men would share the burden equally with women, but the reality of working life for double-income families rules that out. (Obviously there are some exceptions, but this is the rule.)
If the greatest social advance of the last 30 years – the equality of women – is not to run aground under the pressures of childcare, expense and the fact that there are only 24 hours in the day, something has to come to the rescue.That “something” is immigrant women.
In Ireland, the sad solution is an influx of poor, luckless women, fleeing persecution, rape, famine and war.These women,who have often left their own children behind, may have just completed an expensive and dangerous journey, but they are not met at the docks and airports by a powerful political lobby of Irish women intent on bettering the lot of their oppressed sisters.
On the contrary,they are received by a host of professional working women who need their children looked after, houses cleaned and loos scrubbed at the lowest price possible.
This is a huge political and intellectual challenge facing feminism in particular, and the left in general. How to square the circle when the pursuit of equality and the further enhancement of women is based on the probable exploitation of their oppressed sisters?
As Dylan, an icon for early feminism, sang, “The times, they are a-changin’.”









Its nothing new to hear the middle and upper
classes in this country calling for more immigration and
the reduction in restrictions. There is a simple reason
for this, they see themselves as being net beneficiaries
of increased immigration. The services that they require
such as nursing childminders and cleaners will become
cheaper because there are more people supplying them. It
is mainly the working classes that feel threatened by
immigration. The middle classes don’t feel threatened by
immigration because in the short tradition of immigration
in this country immigrants havn’t competed for their jobs.
However this is about to change. The future government
policy is to attract more immigrants from the accession
countries of Eastern Europe and less from outside the EU.
In an article I read recently these immigrants will most
likely be young, female, well educated, and multilingual.
In many cases these immigrants will be better educated
than Irish people. What sort of jobs will these new
immigrants be looking for hardly those of cleaners and
childminders. They maybe willing to do these jobs for a
short period until they find their feet but there real
reason will be to compete for middle class careers such as
laywers, accountants, teachers etc. In the past these
professions have been able to apply subtle restrictions on
entry such as needing to know Irish or having had to have
passed Irish professional examinations. However in the
future Europe will deem these restrictions illegal and
these professions will have to be fully open to all EU
citizens. So what will be the result of this be, it will
result in a lot more competition for white collar jobs
from young well educated Eastern Europeans just as it has
resulted in more competition for blue collar jobs from
Filipino nurses and Turkish construction workers. So to
quote another proverb “Be careful what you wish for you
might just get it”
Dear David
I notice that you are a big fan of inward immigration. I
agree with you up to a point.
However, it is a question of numbers not race. No country
can cope with too rapid an increase in population too
quickly.
A question for you. Why would Ireland want to create jobs,
houses and services in Ireland on a grand scale for
individuals from other countries? Please do not assume that
the jobs for immigrants will all be childminding.
Dear Helen,
Thanks for the comment. On the issue of immigration, it
seems to me that the biggest challenge for the rich world
over the next twenty years will be people. Here there are
three really big pressures. The first is how do we continue
process women’s equality in opportunity and income which is
critical. Second is how do we address the issue of other
people who desperately want to come to the West and the
third question is who will do “manual or shit” work as we
get older and richer.
At the intersection of these three issues, it appears, are
migrants. So it is not so much that I am a fan of inward
migration for its own sake. (In fact, there is no reason
for a certain target of migrants to be a national policy
objective at all as some dreamers seem to think) But it
seems to be part of the overall solution to our dilemma,
rather than a unique panacea.
Thanks David
Dear David
I do not necessarily agree that the biggest challenges are
the three issues you have outlined. However, assuming that
they are, let’s look at each one.
How do we continue to process women’s equality in
opportunity and income? I am not sure that what we are
exclusively trying to do is process women’s equality in
opportunity and income. We are trying to provide workers
for an expanding economy. That ‘women’s liberation’
coincided with that was an accident of timing. However,
let’s accept that what you say is true.
Expecting all women (sometimes men) to be in paid
employment with professional carers for their children or
dependants is not the only way to process women’s equality
in opportunity and income. It is also hugely expensive in
terms of care.
I believe that we should have a carer’s allowance. Instead
of giving money to social workers, women’s groups etc., why
not give it directly to the carers. Women (men) could use
this money to provide direct care or it could be used
flexibly to buy care. What is it about government that it
mostly prefers to give money to intermediaries instead of
directly to the individual needing it?
While we currently get our economic liberation from
employment, that is because it is how the system works. It
is not necessarily for the best and there are social costs,
which I believe should be considered when calculating the
economic ones.
The last question is – who will do the scatological jobs?
This is connected with the first issue of women’s
opportunity etc. Underlying both the first and last issue
is how we value care in the western world. The answer is we
do not value care. This is broader than just childcare.
It is about caring across the board. This is a cultural as
well as an economic issue. It is essential that we
appreciate the value of care and not just economically. If
we do not value care culturally as well as economically, it
will cost us dearly in the long run. Let me give you an
example. It now costs about Euro 110,000.00 to buy care an
annual basis for an individual in a care home with a mild
brain injury. The government will not pay families a
reasonable care allowance to care for such an individual.
If a family hands over care to the state, it (the state)
will then have to pay a fortune to replace the family. Is
this crazy or what? This happens right across the board
from children to disabled individuals to the elderly.
The second issue is how do we address the needs of the many
people who want to come to the west. Like I said already,
no country can cope with unlimited immigration. Ireland
does not have the infrastructure. There is no point
opening the doors to create instability here.
What do I suggest? I suggest a two-part approach. The
first part is organised and regulated immigration. The
second part is inward investment into the countries that
need it. The European Union is already addressing this in
Eastern Europe. In other countries not benefiting from the
European Union, I suggest a buddy system. Depending on
size, we match up a developed country with a developing
one. So, Ireland takes on a country of similar size. This
would be subject to agreement on developing democracy and
the rule of law. At the moment, so much of what is being
done is fragmented and so much aid to Non-governmental
Organisations and others is buying trucks from Toyota or
being wasted.
You are right that we are getting older, but assuming that
we are going to continue getting richer could be
presumptuous. We may not continue getting richer.
Helen
Dear Helen, you have raised a number of really iteresting
issues here. I believe that you are spot on on your idea
about not valuing care in general. Your idea of a buddy
system is fascinating and I’d like to read more about it.
However, we are where we are and we have a system which
appears to have broad support, my question to you is where
do you start to change it?
Regards, David
Dear David
Thank you for your kind comments. There are I think
several strands to your reply. You say we have a system,
which has broad support. If you are referring to our
domestic system in Ireland, then I agree. Apart from the
well articulated reasons for this, I would like to add that
I think there is a collective urge impelling a lot of what
is happening in Ireland at the moment. There is almost a
desperation to be ‘modern’ as if by being modern, we can
assuage the pain and shame of the poverty of the past and
challenge the jibes about our supposed backwardness. So,
do not be too hard on the ‘Aga’ wannabees. We do not
change the drive for modernism in Ireland at the moment.
But, changing the culture and valuing of care could be
achieved through the vehicle of the ‘modern’.
As regards a buddy system for developing countries – unlike
valuing care, where my ideas have come from Wolfsenberger
(Social Role Valorisation) and my experience in litigation
of distinguishing between the cost and value of care plus
my own observations, my buddy idea is entirely my own. My
vision would be to:
1 Float the idea to create awareness
2 Ideally have the UN adopt it
3 Alternatively if just one country ran with it, it could
be start a trend
Helen
Hello everyone,
i have lived in ireland for 6 months now. I came from
Islamabad here in search of work. What i found truely
excites me. Islam is getting a foothold in your catholic
ireland. Now we are few, however soon we will be much more
and then there is no stopping us. Why cannot I not work as
a school teacher here? This is illegal and when we are
greater in number you cannot stop doing such jobs. Look to
France or Germany or even Britain and you will see what
awaits you…the future of ireland is as islamic as is the
future of allof the european nations..
Thank you my irish friends and remember GOD IS GREaT
A great site where one can enjoy the thought of a great mind long departed. Cheers for the good work!
Thank you for being generous with your resources… I hope that you will receive more than you need for your time and
energy. Keep at work!