<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suburbanisation will go bust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2003/05/11/suburbanisation-will-go-bust/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2003/05/11/suburbanisation-will-go-bust?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=suburbanisation-will-go-bust</link>
	<description>The website of economist, author and broadcaster, David McWilliams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2003/05/11/suburbanisation-will-go-bust/comment-page-1#comment-26964</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://46809861#comment-26964</guid>
		<description>seems david mc williams didnt do his research properly back in 2003,...adamstown has begun and with only 250 residents so far the first primary school is being built and will be open in september,..the rail station is opening in april and bus corridors are in operation,...thank god I didnt read this artical before I bought my apartment in adamstown or i may have made a huge mistake and missed my oppertunity to live in a new town which really does/will have every single amenity! Suggest David Mc Williams checks out the Adamstown website,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems david mc williams didnt do his research properly back in 2003,&#8230;adamstown has begun and with only 250 residents so far the first primary school is being built and will be open in september,..the rail station is opening in april and bus corridors are in operation,&#8230;thank god I didnt read this artical before I bought my apartment in adamstown or i may have made a huge mistake and missed my oppertunity to live in a new town which really does/will have every single amenity! Suggest David Mc Williams checks out the Adamstown website,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2003/05/11/suburbanisation-will-go-bust/comment-page-1#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://46809861#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I have just read this article, and am absolutely disgusted 
with its tone, the style of writing and the content. 
Particularly in the provocative use of the words &#039;women&#039;s 
boobs&#039;, to draw in readers. As a woman, I find this highly 
insulting and degrading. Although brief mention is made of 
the male torso, it is given token reference, in a scanty 
attempt to balance the clear insult rendered to women.

There is no attempt at any stage in the article, to 
address the issue of suburbanisation analytically. Similar 
to how David McWilliams handles most issues on his daytime 
programme and on Questions and Answers the other night, it 
is in terms of descriptive soundbites, rather than 
presenting a set of ideas through which we might 
understand or challenge social issues occurring as a 
result of suburbanisation. 

I would like a response from David McWilliams, given that 
I have taken the time to email to this article with a 
comment (as invited). 







 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read this article, and am absolutely disgusted<br />
with its tone, the style of writing and the content.<br />
Particularly in the provocative use of the words &#8216;women&#8217;s<br />
boobs&#8217;, to draw in readers. As a woman, I find this highly<br />
insulting and degrading. Although brief mention is made of<br />
the male torso, it is given token reference, in a scanty<br />
attempt to balance the clear insult rendered to women.</p>
<p>There is no attempt at any stage in the article, to<br />
address the issue of suburbanisation analytically. Similar<br />
to how David McWilliams handles most issues on his daytime<br />
programme and on Questions and Answers the other night, it<br />
is in terms of descriptive soundbites, rather than<br />
presenting a set of ideas through which we might<br />
understand or challenge social issues occurring as a<br />
result of suburbanisation. </p>
<p>I would like a response from David McWilliams, given that<br />
I have taken the time to email to this article with a<br />
comment (as invited).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

