<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why inflated golf club fees point way to economic bust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2001/06/10/why-inflated-golf-club-fees-point-way-to-economic-bust/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2001/06/10/why-inflated-golf-club-fees-point-way-to-economic-bust?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-inflated-golf-club-fees-point-way-to-economic-bust</link>
	<description>The website of economist, author and broadcaster, David McWilliams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2001/06/10/why-inflated-golf-club-fees-point-way-to-economic-bust/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://311178930#comment-16</guid>
		<description>It seems to be conventional wisdom that the price at which 
land (and property in general) trades exceeds its economic 
value. How does one ascertain the long term economic value 
of an asset? Conventional financial theory holds that asset 
prices should be driven by a combination of expected cash 
returns to be generated by the asset and the level of 
interest rates used to convert future returns into present 
value terms. Is property overvalued taking a long term 
view? The answer given in the article would appear to be 
yes. If this is so, could the author outline which of the 
assumptions underlying the current price of property is 
false? Are future income streams to be below expectations? 
Interest rates to rise faster than expected? Are there 
other factors at play?

There is no doubt but that the rapid growth in property 
prices has proved a boon to mainly the older generation. 
The article however fails to demonstrate that it is a 
wealth transfer from young to old. It is certainly a cash 
transfer, but until values fall it can hardly be considered 
a wealth transfer. People who purchase property are making 
a lifestyle choice as well as an investment decision. They 
choose to live in a certain location in a property of a 
certain size. Cheaper choices are available to them.

If there is a bubble in property prices, and if it bursts, 
the wealth transfer will become horrifically apparent. This 
article stops short of advising the investor/house buyer 
how to counteract the wealth transfer effect described. 
Should a family rent accommodation for a period of time 
until the bubble bursts? How long will this take? How much 
of a drop can be expected to occur when it does occur? Alan 
Greenspan warned of irrational exuberance in the US stock 
market in 1996. The correction didn&#039;t come until 2000. Even 
by 2003, at the bottom of the market, the Dow Jones Index 
hadn&#039;t fallen to the 1996 level. Does this prove Alan was 
wrong? Or is the market fundamentally irrational? Property 
is inherently less volatile than stocks. To a potential 
house buyer, four year&#039;s rent would knock a significant 
amount off the purchase price of the house, also 
eliminating a significant part of the interest rate risk.

Congratulations on a thought provoking column. These are 
the thoughts provoked in me. I would welcome feedback on 
these points. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be conventional wisdom that the price at which<br />
land (and property in general) trades exceeds its economic<br />
value. How does one ascertain the long term economic value<br />
of an asset? Conventional financial theory holds that asset<br />
prices should be driven by a combination of expected cash<br />
returns to be generated by the asset and the level of<br />
interest rates used to convert future returns into present<br />
value terms. Is property overvalued taking a long term<br />
view? The answer given in the article would appear to be<br />
yes. If this is so, could the author outline which of the<br />
assumptions underlying the current price of property is<br />
false? Are future income streams to be below expectations?<br />
Interest rates to rise faster than expected? Are there<br />
other factors at play?</p>
<p>There is no doubt but that the rapid growth in property<br />
prices has proved a boon to mainly the older generation.<br />
The article however fails to demonstrate that it is a<br />
wealth transfer from young to old. It is certainly a cash<br />
transfer, but until values fall it can hardly be considered<br />
a wealth transfer. People who purchase property are making<br />
a lifestyle choice as well as an investment decision. They<br />
choose to live in a certain location in a property of a<br />
certain size. Cheaper choices are available to them.</p>
<p>If there is a bubble in property prices, and if it bursts,<br />
the wealth transfer will become horrifically apparent. This<br />
article stops short of advising the investor/house buyer<br />
how to counteract the wealth transfer effect described.<br />
Should a family rent accommodation for a period of time<br />
until the bubble bursts? How long will this take? How much<br />
of a drop can be expected to occur when it does occur? Alan<br />
Greenspan warned of irrational exuberance in the US stock<br />
market in 1996. The correction didn&#8217;t come until 2000. Even<br />
by 2003, at the bottom of the market, the Dow Jones Index<br />
hadn&#8217;t fallen to the 1996 level. Does this prove Alan was<br />
wrong? Or is the market fundamentally irrational? Property<br />
is inherently less volatile than stocks. To a potential<br />
house buyer, four year&#8217;s rent would knock a significant<br />
amount off the purchase price of the house, also<br />
eliminating a significant part of the interest rate risk.</p>
<p>Congratulations on a thought provoking column. These are<br />
the thoughts provoked in me. I would welcome feedback on<br />
these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

